人人拥有公司股权IN THE COMPANY OF OWNERS 下载 pdf 电子版 epub 免费 txt 2025

Stock options have been much maligned recently, mainly because of fatcat executives who've cashed them in for millions, before the share price tanks and average shareholders suffer. But stock options can be a very good thing if handled correctly, say Rutgers University professors Blasi and Kruse and BusinessWeek editor Bernstein. They make the argument for why options-offered to all employees, not just upper-level execs-are a serious boon, "bringing about a more productive company and, ultimately, rewarding employees and outside shareholders alike." The book does seem a bit quaint at times, such as when it talks about how Silicon Valley types have got it right when it comes to options. (Many of those high-tech firms, of course, are either defunct or fighting for their lives.) The pace is somewhat plodding, as the authors recount company strategies and cite various studies, but the introduction and conclusion focus on sexier, newsier issues such as the "option-induced avarice" that led CEOs to jimmy company numbers in order to boost stock price. The authors' plea is a valid one: that "partnership capitalism" not die as a concept for the many, just because of the greedy abuses of a few.

Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc.

作者简介：

JOSEPH BLASI, a sociologist, and DOUGLAS KRUSE, an economist, are professors at Rutgers University's School of Management and Labor Relations in Piscataway, New Jersey. AARON BERNSTEIN is a senior writer at Business Week magazine, based in Washington, D.C.

Preface

Acknowledgments

Part I The History of Partnership Capitalism

1 It All Began with Shockley

2 The Soul of a New Corporation: How High-tech

Companies Institutionalized Partnership Capitalism

3 The Soul of an Old Corporation: From Thales to

Executive Stock Options

Part II Sharing the Company with Employees

4 How High-tech Firms Share the Wealth

5 Why Companies Hand Out New Options Every Year

6 What Shareholders Gain by Giving Up Some of Their

Ownership

7 The Evidence that Stockholders Come Out Ahead

Part III A New Corporate Model

8 Top-down Capitalism: What Would Have to Change in

Corporate America

9 Partnership Capitalism: How to Put It All Together

10 Conclusion

Appendix A: The High Tech 100

Appendix B: The High Tech lO0's Mixed Track Record

Appendix C: How Workers Took a Beating on Employee Ownership

Appendix D: The Corporate America 100

Notes

Bibliography

Index

About the Authors

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：人人拥有公司股权IN THE COMPANY OF OWNERS在线阅读

在线听书地址：人人拥有公司股权IN THE COMPANY OF OWNERS在线收听

在线购买地址：人人拥有公司股权IN THE COMPANY OF OWNERS在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

Joseph Blasi, Douglas Kruse, and Aaron Bernstein show how American companies would perform much better if they followed the lead of many high-tech firms and granted options to their entire workforce, rather than to just a tiny corporate elite. Using SEC data in a way never done before, they document the vast wealth executives have accumulated for themselves and show how the abuse of options has taken place not just at scandal-ridden companies such as Enron and WorldCom but across the entire reach of corporate America.

In the company of Owners argues that there's a better way. Broad employee ownership through stock options offers a new model for U.S. corporations and American capitalism. The authors explain how employees and shareholders alike would benefit if most large companies adopted what they call the partnership capitalism approach - using options to encourage employees to think and act like owners.

The string of business scandals that recently engulfed America painted a picture of corporate chieftains lining their pockets by cutting corners, cooking the books, and duping gullible investors. In doing so, greedy CEOs have hijacked what could be one of the most important business innovations in decades: stock options for all employees. Joseph Blasi, Douglas Kruse, and Aaron Bernstein-all leading experts on employee ownership-show how American companies would perform much better if they followed the lead of many high-tech firms and granted options to their entire workforce, rather than to just a tiny corporate elite. Using SEC data in a way never done before, they document the vast wealth executives have accumulated for themselves. It shows how the abuse of options has taken place not just at scandal-ridden companies such as Enron and WorldCom, but across the entire reach of corporate America. In the Company of Owners argues that there's a better way. Broad-employee ownership through stock options offers a new model for US corporations and American capitalism.

The authors explain how employees and shareholders alike would benefit if most large companies adopted what they call the partnership capitalism approach-using options to encourage employees to think and act like owners. A searing critique of business as usual in America's executive suites, this book offers a comprehensive vision for how stock options can enrich companies, employees, investors, and the US economy as a whole. With its remarkable new evidence and astute synthesis, In the Company of Owners will change the way America thinks about stock options. Joseph R. Blasi, a sociologist, and Douglas L. Kruse, an economist, are professors at Rutgers University's School of Management and Labor Relations. Aaron Bernstein is a senior writer at Business Week magazine.

From Publishers Weekly

Stock options have been much maligned recently, mainly because of fatcat executives who've cashed them in for millions, before the share price tanks and average shareholders suffer. But stock options can be a very good thing if handled correctly, say Rutgers University professors Blasi and Kruse and BusinessWeek editor Bernstein. They make the argument for why options-offered to all employees, not just upper-level execs-are a serious boon, "bringing about a more productive company and, ultimately, rewarding employees and outside shareholders alike." The book does seem a bit quaint at times, such as when it talks about how Silicon Valley types have got it right when it comes to options. (Many of those high-tech firms, of course, are either defunct or fighting for their lives.) The pace is somewhat plodding, as the authors recount company strategies and cite various studies, but the introduction and conclusion focus on sexier, newsier issues such as the "option-induced avarice" that led CEOs to jimmy company numbers in order to boost stock price. The authors' plea is a valid one: that "partnership capitalism" not die as a concept for the many, just because of the greedy abuses of a few.

From Library Journal

Stock options have gotten a bad name in the recent business scandals, but Rutgers professors Blasi and Douglas Kruse and Business Week editor Aaron Bernstein argue that the abuses of a few should not blind us to a very useful remuneration tool. Rather, they espouse the belief that stock options should be offered to all employees in all stock companies, calling their proposal "partnership capitalism" or "stock option capitalism." They make a strong case that offering stock options to everyone can motivate employees, foster a more efficient organization, and flatten hierarchy while remaining forthright about potential problems and abuses. The authors have published extensively in academic presses on this topic and, with this clearly written volume, are trying to spread the word to the general public. They use little jargon and put their extensive footnotes, appendixes, and other scholarly buttressing in the back of the book. Libraries that have some of Blasi and Kruse's early works can pass; otherwise, this is strongly recommended for academic and public library investment collections.

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Patrick J. Brunet, Western Wisconsin Technical Coll. Lib., LaCrosse

Book Dimension

Height (mm) 235 　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Width (mm) 156

• 作者：京墨 发布时间：2024-03-03 18:29:22

  传播伦理四原则，课略。

• 作者：Tag 发布时间：2024-02-21 20:47:25

  上学期没选的必修，比较基础

  龚老师的教学真是引人入胜，王老师纯属对着书上的图截下来做的ppt，不过也算清楚

• 作者：shamenotalone 发布时间：2019-12-03 17:48:56

  进化角度来分析各种决策的形成，可读

• 作者：梵小凡 发布时间：2020-07-28 12:03:35

  友人相赠。亮点还是在翻页上，很多很多的翻页，甚至翻页下面还有翻页；科普内容比较浅显，介绍了几种常见的恐龙，画风不是写实类，色彩比较鲜艳。霸王龙的翻译是君王暴龙，也是查了资料才能确定是同一种龙。君王暴龙确实是比较正规的叫法，但平时还是习惯叫霸王龙，总之这个名称给我带来了一些困惑和麻烦

• 作者：haku 发布时间：2022-11-27 16:42:14

  20221127 周末下午闲的没事 一口气看完。两小时看完，粗略知道了py的特点。后续还需要找一本更加细致的宝典书，一边编程一边查询。说是给青少年看的，实际上完全没有老外写的有趣。这书上的文字，青少年肯定是看不下去的。

• 作者：猪肝君 发布时间：2022-10-30 22:14:49

  大老虎想抓可不容易。当我还现在想箱子里是什么宝藏，就进了老虎的陷阱，生死看天了。

• 陈嘉庚先生的大智慧

  作者：cub18 发布时间：2010-11-23 00:28:51

  在集美生活，身边处处是陈嘉庚先生的影子。有他亲自兴办的集美学村，有他安息的鳌园，有近年建成的嘉庚纪念堂、嘉庚体育馆，还有正在规划中的集美新地标诚毅大道……看陈嘉庚先生的立像，很似缩小版的安西教练，西装革履，戴副眼镜，右手持杖，左手拿着礼帽，是位慈祥平和的长者。最近读《陈嘉庚年谱》，才第一次感受到他的大智慧。

  一

  印象中的陈嘉庚先生是一位很有钱很有钱的大华侨，热心教育，出资创建集美大学和厦门大学，不过湿湿碎。却不知他是倾其所有，毁家兴学，且在61岁时（1934年）资本已经亏失殆尽。当外界风传厦大、集美两校也将因此停办时，陈嘉庚先生发表声明称两校自可维持，绝无影响，“愿国人勿引我之困厄为口实，致阻公益事业之进展，陷我于罪人，幸甚”。此后20余年他不离不弃，四处奔走，主持两校的建设和发展，直至病重之际还在关心学生的早晚自修和龙舟赛组织办法。

  中国人重家业的积累和传承，本与卡耐基“在巨富中死去，是一种耻辱”这般的财富观格格不入。今年巴菲特和盖茨的慈善中国行，搅得不少本土富豪坐卧不安，当年陈嘉庚先生在许多人眼中也是个麻烦制造者。1924年，他在印尼万隆和泗水等地游历，代厦大图书馆向富侨募捐，均遭拒绝。为此陈嘉庚先生十分感慨，说“不但希望向富侨募捐数十百万元为基金归于失败，而仅此十万八万元或四五万元建图书馆尚且如此困难，所可怪者，我国人传统习惯，生平艰难辛苦，多为子孙计，……既不为社会计，亦不为自身名誉计，真是愚不可及！”

  愚不可及？难道倾尽家产办学校就算聪明？捐一点儿，讨个好名声，余下的留给自家子孙，不是皆大欢喜吗？陈嘉庚先生在1920年筹办厦大的演讲中曾详细陈述过自己为何如此尽心教育。他说国家之富强全在乎国民，国民之发展全在乎教育，欧美各国教育之所以发达，原因就在于不仅政府重视，人民也普遍关注。然而许多华侨不愿回国，有的虽然回国，也不过拥巨资图安逸，专事奢华，对实业和教育不闻不问。因此自己“惟有身先作则，创办数事，以警醒之。兹出家财之半，或十分之三四，恐乃不能动其心，故将所有家财尽出之，以办教育，并亲来中国经营，以冀将来事或成功，使其他华侨有所感动也”。

  原来陈嘉庚先生目光高远，追求的是以自身行动为世范，感召更多华侨回馈祖国，着实让人敬佩。

  二

  支撑陈嘉庚先生远大理想的，是其极为务实的行事风格，从两件小事可见一斑。

  厦门大学初创时，陈延庭受聘负责建筑施工，陈嘉庚先生每十天半月就从新加坡来信叮嘱工料建费等事。1922年12月函中谈及建师生宿舍与科学实验室需按财力行事，“吾人作事当先求事实为宗旨，盖在初步依时代（按五年左右），学生不多（成千名），各科只求完备建设不求扩大规模。”次年4月又致函陈延庭，提到建筑厦大校舍宜节省花费，求“粗中带雅”。陈嘉庚先生预料不出二三十年，世界建筑必有极大变化，“许时我厦大生额万众，基金万万元，势必更新屋式以合其时科学之用法，故免作千年计，而只作三五十年计已足矣。况我已建之屋，若论坚固，二百年尚可保有余，若论外观，则比上不如，若比下则过之，何必以有限之微财而效欧美富豪之用资？”

      1937年，福建省政府奉教育部指令，禁止设立私立师范学校和中学，集美师范与中学也在禁止之列，这对陈嘉庚先生是个极大的打击（彼时厦大已移交给政府）。但他很快书信集美学校校长陈村牧，认为学校当抱定以下三条宗旨：一、政府能办者，或政府注意办者，本校切切勿办，而让政府去干；二、私立能办者，或私立多办者，本校亦让他干办，切勿与之争办；三、政府及私立未办者，或无人办者，虽如何困难，本校应当注意负责干办之，万万不可畏难弱志，至为紧要。如现下之农业、水产、商业三校，务希极力扩充，切切从此三校下手。”

      

      今天的厦门大学以嘉庚式建筑闻名于世，今天的集美大学特色优势在航海与水产，这都是陈嘉庚先生留下的宝贵遗产。没有投机，没有急功近利，点点滴滴，聚沙成塔，凭着这分务实，陈嘉庚先生的教育事业走过了时局动荡、物资匮乏的20世纪，成为我们整个国家的财富。

  三

  陈嘉庚先生办学的年代学生运动风起云涌，集美、厦大两校也不例外，先后爆发了三次学潮。陈嘉庚先生每一次都坚定地站在校长一边，对学生要求不予采纳，似有“反动”之嫌。

  柴静最近写朱光潜，有一段提到“1929年，当时社会风潮处处鼓呼让学生运动，他却让青年时时小心‘十字街头上握有最大威权的是习俗。习俗有两种，一为传统，一为时尚。儒家的礼教，五芳斋的馄饨，是传统；新文化运动，四马路的新装，是时尚。传说尊旧，时尚趋新，新旧虽不同，而盲从附和，不假思索，则根本无二致’他说‘强者皇然叫嚣，弱者随声附和，旧者盲从传说，新者盲从时尚，相习成风，每况愈下，而社会之浮浅顽劣虚伪酷毒，乃日不可收拾。”朱光潜说，“我们要能于叫嚣扰攘中，能自由伸张自我，不要汩没在十字街头的影响里去。”

  无独有偶，陈嘉庚先生在1926年劝告学生不要介入党派活动。在他眼里，当时不论共产党或国民党，引诱青年入党，搞的都是“愚民”、“邀功”、“请赏”的一套。他认为“救国不专在武力，亦不属宣言，是以亟我血汗财力输办教育”，希望“造成将来有用之才”。朱光潜的美学之道，陈嘉庚的教育信念，让他们在那个纷杂的年代保持了一分超脱和清明。

  陈嘉庚先生侨居新加坡60年，对国内时局的发展却有极为准确的判断。1938年，当全国还在争论抗日“速胜论”和“亡国论”时，他已经预料到中日战争日本必败，上海等处战后重建需大量建材，打算招股建洋灰厂和砖瓦厂。他嘱陈村牧前往调查安溪地理、地址和交通等情况，如可建厂，就向政府申请二十年专利权，这样“集校也可分沾多少永久利益”。1946年，蒋介石出兵二百多万向解放区发动全面进攻，陈嘉庚先生却乐观地估计蒋政权覆亡在即。接受《现代日报》采访时他断言内战“不必五年，最多三年，独裁贪污者必倒，民主派必胜利”。

  因为工作的关系，我时常接触华侨和海外留学生。他们对国内时局大抵有两种态度，一类已生隔膜，不闻不问，另一类情绪高昂，逢大事发生，表现得比国人更为积极。有次看《锵锵三人行》，听徐子东调侃窦文涛 “你能比华侨更爱国？”，我躺在床上会心一笑。

  在外看祖国，究竟是雾里看花还是旁观者清呢，众说纷纭。观点不一了，就互相指责对方上了媒体的当。那是什么让陈嘉庚先生洞若观火，仿佛章鱼保罗附体呢？

  在我看来，秘密就在他为集美学校所提的校训“诚毅”二字上：“诚以为国，实事求是，大公无私；毅以处事，百折不挠，努力奋斗”。这里面藏着陈嘉庚先生一生的大智慧。

• 一部好的社会派侦探小说

  作者：达西先生 发布时间：2008-09-08 21:27:23

      好的评论应该能让读者在短时间内知道书或电影在各方面的优劣。你可能需要简化大段的情节描述和个人感触。

      好吧，我把废话删掉了。

      《混》是一部典型的美国式的硬汉侦探小说，这种推理小说的特点在于把描写的重点放在了案情的实际侦破上和主人公的塑造上，这不是废话吗？我的意思是写实的案情侦破+相对简单的犯罪，而不是类似于日本本格派，阿加莎克里斯蒂的以杀死脑细胞为乐，纯靠逻辑推理，演绎法的不动脚只动脑子的纸上谈兵。

      很难说两者孰优孰劣，青菜萝卜各有所爱，我小时候就比较喜欢看纯解谜的本格推理，大了，对社会更感兴趣了，就更喜欢《混》这种了，因为一旦和现实社会有关，人物的形象就立马丰满起来，在这部小说中，作者塑造了一个多面性相当强的主角，读完以后你会真正体会到“栩栩如生的人物形象”。

      “当你凝视深渊的时候，深渊也在凝视着你”，作为一个和城市黑暗面长期接触的人，哈里博斯是否真的有倾向《星球大战》里绝地武士所谓的黑暗面呢？是否真的有滥用职权呢？当“玩偶制造者”似乎没有死，又制造了一起案件后，原本坚信自己是正义的哈里博斯也不禁自省：我开枪真的对吗？被枪杀的是真正的凶手吗？我也有一颗黑暗的心吗？

      就像书中所说，正义是一个埋在混凝土里的金发女郎，看不见你，听不见你，也不对你说话，当你呼唤她时，也不会理你，在你打碎混凝土之前，你永远也不知道正义是什么，正义在哪里。

      社会派推理小说的另一个优点在于，真实地反映了一部分的社会面貌，从对警察，妓女，法庭内外调查等等方面的描写和叙述中看出，作者曾经是一个犯罪新闻记者的经历给他的创作提供了很好的基础。看完书，你可以对美国法庭辩护流程与策略，色情产业，警察制度等等有个浅的，但很直观的认识。

      最后要提的是，虽然作为一个前新闻记者，但作者的文笔也有让人眼前一亮之处。读完将近500页的书，其中有几处印象很深，不举例了，会影响不仅是你而且还有我的观感的。