淘气小子马克斯第一辑：全4册（童书作家送给孩子的爆笑校园生活启示录） 下载 pdf 电子版 epub 免费 txt 2025

《淘气小子马克斯 竞选班长》

主题：挫折教育、逆商培养、乐观心态、校园霸凌

成为班长，不做笑话！

当马克斯被迫竞选班长时，他一点底气都没有！

是的，他怎么可能赢呢？体育不好，既不聪明也不帅，连个子都不是的，可谓一无所长。可是他别无选择，只能努力。竞选过程中笑点和事故齐发：海报危机、潜伏教室的鸭子、奶昔故事、空中接力事故……他也从一本正经地“努力”变成了一本正经地“搞笑”。

他究竟能否胜出？竞选背后又有什么不为人知的秘密？

《淘气小子马克斯 超能力脱口秀》

主题：领导力、观察力、逆商培养、心理教育、家庭教育、亲情教育

红山镇举办脱口秀比赛，马克斯认为这是他风趣事业的首秀。但是意外无处不在，一个小丑的出现，轻松碾压了马克斯的风头。

这个奇怪的小丑究竟是谁？为什么会和爷爷的失踪扯上千丝万缕的联系？在好友的帮助下，他能否顺利解开爷爷失踪之谜并克服名利的诱惑赢得比赛呢？

《淘气小子马克斯 露营大作战》

主题：社交行为培养、想象力、包容心、理解力、性别认知

——露营地有鳄龙怪？

——胡说！

——鳄龙怪出来偷东西了？

——谣言！

——鳄龙怪竟然还有大本营？

——别说了，马克斯被吓哭了！

传说中的鳄龙怪，被走私的鸭子，倾覆的小船，被鸟围观的帐篷……

一场露营，马克斯遇到了恶作剧界新对手——泰森。

可是，泰森怎么和马克斯和好了？

殊不知在马克斯和泰森斗得不亦乐乎之时，一场搞怪局中局已经悄然收网……

男孩子和女孩子的恶作剧方式虽然不同，但终效果都会让人大吃一惊。

不要小瞧任何人哦！

《淘气小子马克斯 狗狗保卫战》

主题：财商培养、生命教育、爱护动物

濒危动物保护赛拉开帷幕。马克斯和他的小伙伴们不得不面对一群狗狗。好吧，它们其实很可爱。

马克斯觉得，这是他展示才干的好机会——在筹款活动中大展所长，在狗狗“走私”活动中爆笑百出，为伟大的红山食堂作战，他还策划了一个秘密游乐园……

只是，狗狗是濒危动物吗？竟然能凭狗狗赢得比赛？

马克斯输得心服口不服。

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

马特·斯坦顿

澳大利亚童书作家和插画师，图书售出超过25万册。他与别人共同创作了热门童书《我的床底下有只放屁的怪物》《必须尿尿的海盗》《驼鹿跑了》等。2017年出版的系列图书《淘气小子马克斯》受到了全球孩子的追捧。

刘勇军

资深译者，英语语言文学专业，湖南邵东人，闲暇时读书、译书、写作，译有《月亮与六便士》等。

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：淘气小子马克斯第一辑：全4册（童书作家送给孩子的爆笑校园生活启示录）在线阅读

在线听书地址：淘气小子马克斯第一辑：全4册（童书作家送给孩子的爆笑校园生活启示录）在线收听

在线购买地址：淘气小子马克斯第一辑：全4册（童书作家送给孩子的爆笑校园生活启示录）在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

★国外版“马小跳”“米小圈”比《小屁孩日记》更好玩！

★《竞选班长》一出版就登上澳大利亚童书榜冠军。从2017年出版以来，在澳大利亚累计销量超过六位数！

★培养阅读习惯。有趣的故事 孩子思维 幽默的文字 丰富的想象力 夸张的情节，给孩子不一样的阅读体验。

★送给孩子的爆笑校园生活启示录。校园霸凌、同学关系、财商培养、情绪管理、逆商教育……你想让孩子看到的内容，这里都有。内容取材于真实的儿童生活，让孩子在幽默的故事中懂得成长的真谛。

★传递正确的行为方式及价值导向，不管是被诬陷还是恶作剧，如何正确应对，才是成长的有趣之处。

重磅推荐： 

《许愿地球仪》：荣获7项世界童书大奖、畅销全球十八个国家的生命教育经典力作，白马时光小白马童书品牌重磅首发。 

推荐您购买白马时光其他畅销书：

书摘插图

媒体评论

看完梦里想起来都会笑醒的故事书，喜欢马克斯和鸭子！

-

蓝奇，

11

岁

我的妈妈大笑起来！

-

艾丹，小读者

我喜欢书中的一切，包括鸭子。

-

艾略特，小读者

幽默被注入每一页。

-

澳大利亚儿童图书理事会

如果你是《小屁孩日记》的粉丝，这本书肯定是你喜欢的。

- Mania

杂志

• 作者：小澄 发布时间：2024-02-19 23:39:07

  第二部分可以看看

• 作者：阿耨 发布时间：2019-08-04 20:33:48

  读不懂，算不来。但整体是积极向上的，不好的相也有化解之法。

• 作者：鱼·无 发布时间：2009-11-10 22:56:51

  我家里收集的就是这个版本

• 作者：xjd 发布时间：2023-12-24 06:09:20

  还是中国相关的内容看了带劲

• 作者：i 发布时间：2011-12-23 14:51:15

  噱头挺响的，解析新闻热点，自己也能热一把，哈哈，作者不愧是传媒中人。多么完美的结合啊。

• 作者：mumudancing 发布时间：2018-10-28 14:35:03

  好多年前读的《追忆似水年华》，这本书像电影一样把法国生动细腻的生活景象展在眼前，真是不可思议。喜欢线条明朗色彩明丽的画风，有意思的恰是，明明画风清晰却制造了朦胧浪漫的美感，那么，功劳真当归于普鲁斯特文字的魔力了。

• 不说内容，换个角度看此书

  作者：竹林听雨 发布时间：2009-12-13 09:51:39

  书名是《牛棚杂忆》，实际还包括了《书斋杂录》和《病榻杂记》两部分，不过，只看《牛棚杂忆》就够了。

  季老的杂忆，把绝大多数的人名都抹去了。可是越是这样，越引起读者的好奇心，倒想刨根问底的挖出那些当时的风云人物来。就像季老写的，很想知道那些当时打打抄抄的浪尖上的英雄们，如今是怎样看待那段岁月的呢？也很好奇那些人现在是什么地位呢？他们也该有五六十岁了吧，是否已经成为了掌握话语权的人，从而集体沉默了呢？

  距离那段历史结束，仅仅过去了三十年，我们却几乎不知道那时发生了什么，继而思考，为什么会发送这样的事情，那还谈什么以史为鉴！

  历史是不应该被抹杀的，不论美丑，可惜，人人都爱打扮它。

  季老也已经远去，该不会再有人站出来说话了。

  另外，此书印刷质量、纸张质量都非常好，就是书挺厚挺沉，拿在手上有点重。

• The Craft of Writing Papers: Reviews of Writing for Social Scientists

  作者：苏格拉底大王 发布时间：2011-03-18 16:02:25

  Howard S. Becker is a sociologist of America, who writes the book Writing for Social Scientists, and generously shares his experience and insightful understanding of writing. He analyzes the writing issues from the perspective of sociology, which is very interesting. However, the most important factor, which makes this book successful, is frankness which moves a lot of people. This is interesting because there are so many books devoted themselves to improving the public’s writing skills, but most of them only tell us what we should do, rather than writing from the perspective of readers.

  He works as an anthropologist and treats his class as fieldwork. He asks his students whose fears of writing overshadow their torture of taking the class of composition again, to share their experience of writing, which convinces readers that all of us share common patterns of writing. We treat writing as work that should be done once, which is of course a difficult job to finish. So we turn to all kinds of rituals which waste a lot of time. What we should do is start to write right now.

  Howard S. Becker proposes to write clear, understandable, and plain prose. He explains why he did so in chapter 2 of this book, which claims that we write flowery sentences to distinguish ourselves from people in other fields, rather than getting into the real answers to the question. If we aim at pursuing these personas rather than uncovering the hidden pattern of the world, writing means quite different things.

  What we should do is start to write right now. He discusses with us what should we do at the start of writing. For example, write your outline first, and write your introduction last. Writing a sentence doesn’t hurt you, and it even helps you to find out what you have and what you would like to say. It helps to sort out your thoughts and make your words physically. Don’t intend to be critical at this phase. This example reminds me of YAN Gengwang’s reflection about the failure of one of his outstanding peers who seldom begins to write until he feels he had got ready for it. The result is, in his life, he only writes one piece of paper which is insightful but very short.

  Another important part is how to begin, which I have a great passion for. Wright Mills shares his secrets of doing research, he makes notes on all the aspects of a specific topic and shuffles the notes to re-combine the different concepts in order to get the imagination of sociology. Howard S. Becker holds similar, but more concrete ideas. "Begin by taking notes on what you have written, put each idea on a file card.” Then sort your stack of cards into files, and sequence the files. Howard reminds us from the first time we can be critical at the first time. We can put out the generalization cards on a table, a door, or a wall. In addition to that, if we can’t find the one right way, Howard suggests we talk about why we can’t, why you choose a less-than-perfect solution, and what it all means. We can’t solve the question in one paper.

  He asserts that scholars must learn to write professionally. He gives us his own experience of submitting a paper to the American Journal of Sociology. Everett Hughes reviews this paper and comments that his sentences sounded like they have been translated from German. Another example I know is given by CHEN GuanRong, who is a professor of the city university of Hong Kong. Chen said that if you write your paper within three days and submit it out without editing, it’s unlikely to be accepted by the journal because even the reviewers have to spend two weeks to read through your paper and give their comments which are usually very long and written carefully.

  Howard further discusses a lot of things on writing as a professional, risks of sitting down to write (which means trusting your peers and yourself), submitting, literature review, and writing with computers. Most of them are very interesting and will surprise me. I’ll re-read this classic piece of work to direct my writing and studies.

  Last, I want to quote Howard’s words, “they don’t argue with me, they just don’t do it”. I’d like to act to test Howard’s advice. Hopefully, I can apply them to my research project.