ROCK AND ROLL CAGE MATCH 下载 pdf 电子版 epub 免费 txt 2025

Music defines us. To return the favor, we’ll stick up with zealous passion for the performers and bands that we love . . . and heap aspersions and ridicule upon people who dare to place their allegiances above our own. In Rock and Roll Cage Match, today’s leading cultural critics, humorists, music journalists, and musicians themselves take sides in thirty of the all-time juiciest “who’s better” musical disputes.

Marc Spitz on the Smiths vs. the Cure: “If the Smiths are its James Dean, the Cure are the Marlon Brando of modern rock.”

Gideon Yago on Nirvana vs. Metallica: “Here is why Nirvana will always be a better band than Metallica. It’s not because they hit harder (they do). It’s not because they are tighter (they’re definitely not). . . . It’s because Metallica is fundamentally about respecting rules—of metal, of production, of technicality—and Nirvana is about breaking those rules down in the pursuit of innovation. Metallica was metal. Nirvana was something else.”

Touré on Michael Jackson vs. Prince: “[Prince] was the wild son of Jimi, the younger brother of Rick James and Richard Pryor, the ultrasexual black Casanova who told you up front that he had a dirty mind . . . Michael held the opposite appeal. His music was often about escaping through dance or being hopeful about the world, and he came across as super-innocent.”

Russ Meneve on Bruce Springsteen vs. Bon Jovi: “I really, truly mean it when I say, Mr. Springsteen, no disrespect . . . you are a legend. But in the Battle a da Jerz, when that thick chemical-waste smoke clears and the overly sprayed mall hair parts, the Jov man is the last man rockin’.”

Whitney Pastorek on Whitney Houston vs. Mariah Carey: “Frankly, dry recitations of figures are just too easily negated by simple things like, say, bringing up someone’s horrible taste in choosing movie roles. Watch, I’ll do it right now: Yes, Mariah has seventeen number one singles, and Whitney only eleven. But Whitney made The Bodyguard, which is basically a classic, and Mariah starred in Glitter, a colossal suckfest of crapitude that should disqualify her on the spot.”

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：ROCK AND ROLL CAGE MATCH在线阅读

在线听书地址：ROCK AND ROLL CAGE MATCH在线收听

在线购买地址：ROCK AND ROLL CAGE MATCH在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

Music defines us. To return the favor, we’ll stick up with zealous passion for the performers and bands that we love . . . and heap aspersions and ridicule upon people who dare to place their allegiances above our own. In Rock and Roll Cage Match, today’s leading cultural critics, humorists, music journalists, and musicians themselves take sides in thirty of the all-time juiciest “who’s better” musical disputes.

Marc Spitz on the Smiths vs. the Cure: “If the Smiths are its James Dean, the Cure are the Marlon Brando of modern rock.”

Gideon Yago on Nirvana vs. Metallica: “Here is why Nirvana will always be a better band than Metallica. It’s not because they hit harder (they do). It’s not because they are tighter (they’re definitely not). . . . It’s because Metallica is fundamentally about respecting rules—of metal, of production, of technicality—and Nirvana is about breaking those rules down in the pursuit of innovation. Metallica was metal. Nirvana was something else.”

Touré on Michael Jackson vs. Prince: “[Prince] was the wild son of Jimi, the younger brother of Rick James and Richard Pryor, the ultrasexual black Casanova who told you up front that he had a dirty mind . . . Michael held the opposite appeal. His music was often about escaping through dance or being hopeful about the world, and he came across as super-innocent.”

Russ Meneve on Bruce Springsteen vs. Bon Jovi: “I really, truly mean it when I say, Mr. Springsteen, no disrespect . . . you are a legend. But in the Battle a da Jerz, when that thick chemical-waste smoke clears and the overly sprayed mall hair parts, the Jov man is the last man rockin’.”

Whitney Pastorek on Whitney Houston vs. Mariah Carey: “Frankly, dry recitations of figures are just too easily negated by simple things like, say, bringing up someone’s horrible taste in choosing movie roles. Watch, I’ll do it right now: Yes, Mariah has seventeen number one singles, and Whitney only eleven. But Whitney made The Bodyguard, which is basically a classic, and Mariah starred in Glitter, a colossal suckfest of crapitude that should disqualify her on the spot.”

• 作者：bird 发布时间：2021-09-06 23:02:14

  相比金智英那粗糙纪实的女性表达，韩江这领先好多年，写法也高级得多。细挖之下相似的议题，韩江大胆奇特的构思精彩，令人印象深刻，难怪布克奖赏识。渴望做一棵树的想法是对人类社会多么失望啊，韩江写了一个现世做树的极端角色，我才了悟这个在脑海流窜过的渴望毫无诗意可言，代表着生活质量和社会位置已被排出为人的价值。

• 作者：刀刀刀刀 发布时间：2020-03-30 12:53:27

  家里有五本，设计的太凑合了

• 作者：tata 发布时间：2019-07-20 09:15:46

  各种乐评人，大学教授，文化类研究者撰稿，有好文，也有水文（一些对迪伦迷来说早就不新鲜的观点）。滚雷秀和宗教那两篇尤其不错，值得一读，最后一篇说到母亲和电台的那部分感觉有点瞎扯了哈哈哈。翻译相当好，注释加分，基本没有大错，像我这种较真的叩门读者都满意

• 作者：你少说两句 发布时间：2024-01-18 19:04:05

  完全没有重点的狗屎书和讲了等于没讲的垃圾老师

• 作者：大力花 发布时间：2023-08-13 21:28:00

  关于辅食不太认同 看的晚了点 pdf喂养法没赶上 自主入睡也是个渣渣

• 作者：来福 发布时间：2013-01-21 01:25:40

  高尚的可以带收费站的照片，但是城市不全啊

• 略读小感

  作者：少年游 发布时间：2017-03-07 23:24:34

  粗略读了一遍，虽来不及慢慢品味其中精细部分，亦觉温暖人心。温酒暖人心，故事也是。百度的简介里有这样一句话“在浮杂的都市生活里，你是否早已丢失想象和幻想，不再相信童话？可你还是爱听故事，对吗？孩童的天性一直都藏在心底深处，只是没意识到要把它挖掘出来。”读完书后才发觉，那个孩童还在我内心深处，只是我很久没去看他了，那个孩子还是那么倔强，倔强的相信世间有美好的一面。

    不敢把这书与各大名著相比，这书于我是一杯温酒，暖暖的，很贴心。希望你也能有机会读一读这本书，带着这本书，去看看那个倔强的自己是不是还在自己心底，念安。

• 每一个时代都有成为新物种的可能

  作者：丹青明媚 发布时间：2018-01-14 21:47:37

  借着写读书笔记，又重新翻了一遍这本书

  大部分的阅读在阅读后要么了解了核心逻辑，要么被作者带领经历了特殊的风景

  而这本书，我在看过之后，却几乎没有产生更多的印象。

  除了因为里面汇聚了大量的新名词，新案例，

  还有一个原因就是它连解读的逻辑也是全新的。

  1，

  这本书最初給我略冲击的一段是：美丽新智人就是这么诞生的，直播，ps修图，短视频工具，网红，微整，快美妆，街拍，自拍无人机。。新颜值推广广之：牛油果，味觉大师，轻断食，抵达清单，everlane，造作家具，小白鞋，ace hotel。

  所谓的认知升级，突然具象化的冲击到了你。

  因为当你还对美丽这一词汇停留在天然的基础上的时候。

  当下的美丽已经被技术重新进行了“意义覆盖”，

  这就是认知升级，它的背后是技术，大数据，生活方式，以及最后在审美和界面上的表现。

  2，

  有很多案例的点评，让你重新挑战你的认知体系

  比如，

  评价时间的朋友打败跨年晚会成为爆款，是认知审美击败娱乐疲劳审美的创意胜利

  企鹅吃喝指南，这一类的美食测评，代表了今天省时间的链接效率

  比如

  审美成为真正的激励因素，价格因此不再敏感

  在技术如此趋同的的行业，戴森的成功来自于“更懂用户＋技术＋设计”

  设计力构建更具扩展性的商业模式里

  内容力，链接势能，人格化背书，新技术整合，流量变现模式都在重组

  “一切商业皆内容”越来越成为共同认知

  意义取代功能，成为新物种与用户的全新连接方式

  3，

  在第一部分里关于解读新物种特种的核心要素里：

  意义覆盖

  反经验

  更细节

  场景流

  在线信用

  设计力

  混合内容

  人格化

  我觉得比较原创的是提出了意义覆盖和场景流着两个全新的观念，虽然非常难以理解。

  简单的说，就是意义大于功能，新的商业文明的出发点在于链接，重构意义

  这是所有新物种产生的根本

  而其他要素，反经验，更细节，设计力，人格化，以至于混合内容

  其实是传统营销在新时期的变化和提法

  只是用在新物种的基因上，复合成了全新的要素。

  4，

  其实没有绝对的新物种和绝对的时代

  但在每一个时代，

  都有成为新物种的可能。