新编奥数精讲与测试 二年级 下载 pdf 电子版 epub 免费 txt 2025

暂无相关简介，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：新编奥数精讲与测试 二年级在线阅读

在线听书地址：新编奥数精讲与测试 二年级在线收听

在线购买地址：新编奥数精讲与测试 二年级在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

暂无其它内容！

• 作者：巭 发布时间：2017-11-06 12:24:26

  就一网络新闻的细节版，要文学性没文学性，要心理刻画没有心理刻画，完全没有打动人心的东西，被豆瓣评分骗了，这么高的评分大概是刷出来的，大骗纸！

• 作者：蛋包饼。 发布时间：2013-11-25 05:17:13

  继续跳坑= =

• 作者：xiaoy 发布时间：2012-04-21 22:50:09

  终于比较清楚的明白了雍正即位前后的史料

• 作者：再 发布时间：2020-09-02 23:38:09

  全书没有趣味性、没有知识性，人物没有一个可爱的，非得这么闹哄哄吗

• 作者：holly2007 发布时间：2022-06-19 21:04:08

  敦·毛利小五郎。借阅于大众书局之江北虹悦城店。

• 作者：ripple 发布时间：2020-06-17 17:17:10

  天呐精彩绝伦，对话秘密二，致敬月光社，击碎成见偏见，树立实见己见，光风霁月玉壶冰心。“一十九年光阴于汝，茕茕一颗真心独碎。”字里行间是为勇敢少年洗脱旧气陈怨，将心比心，努力成为新技术时代的月光骄子。

• Campbell Misrepresents the Data of the real China Study

  作者：木森Moose 发布时间：2014-10-23 18:00:59

  Colin Campbell is so intent on promoting a vegan data that he misrepresents the data in the real China Study and cherry picks anti-animal food data. For instance, he rightly cites the link between milk and autoimmune disease but fails to mention that gluten, from wheat and related grains, is at least as important a cause. He writes of the association between casein, a milk protein, with cancer, but fails to mention that whey and butterfat are protective against cancer, and in milk you get all of them. He makes completely false statements like folate not being in meat when organ meats are much higher in folate than any plant source according to the USDA. He assumes nutrient consistency with the US without actually measuring it, despite the fact that soil nutrients and species differences have a huge effect on nutrition.

  On cancer, he uses this data from the real China Study Mortality, Biochemistry, Diet and Lifestyle in Rural China: Geographic Study of the Characteristics of 69 Counties in Mainland China and 16 Areas in Taiwan and claims it shows you shouldn't eat animal protein, but in fact it shows just the opposite. The higher the positive number, the more the cancer association. The negative numbers show that a food source, like fats (lipids) actually protect against cancer. (Yes, mildly lowers the risk.)

  Associations of Selected Variables with Mortality for All Cancers in the China Study Total Protein +12%

  Animal Protein +3%

  Fish Protein +7%

  Plant Protein +12%

  Total Lipids -6%

  Carbohydrates +23%

  Total Calories +16%

  Fat % Calories -17%

  Fiber +21%

  Fat (questionnaire) -29%*

  ==============================

  (Data taken from the original monograph of the China Study.)

  Sugar, soluble carbohydrates, and fiber all have correlations with cancer mortality about seven times the magnitude of that with animal protein, and total fat and fat as a percentage of calories were both negatively correlated with cancer mortality. This doesn't mean that you shouldn't eat protein, because the correlation of eating all food with cancer is +100%, but chances are the higher fat and protein diet will be safer than a high carbohydrate diet.

  Why do I say "chances are"? A correlation is only as good as the data it collects. In China, people wealthy enough to have animal protein are also more likely to eat sugar, processed foods, high fructose corn syrup, to lower vegetable intake and to be able to drive instead of bicycle. They are also more likely to live in the heavily polluted urban centers. This information was not collected, and may actually be causal as opposed to be merely correlated.

  The only questions in the China study about protein consumption were 'how many times a month do you eat fish/meat/eggs/dairy?' There were no questions about which of those foods you eat. For instance, oysters are so important a source of zinc, that native New Guinea tribesmen who live in the interior and have access to meat, insist on going through a war zone to get the oysters once a month. Or they arrange an exchange of mountain fruits for oysters with the very tribes they are fighting. But there were no questions that differentiated fish, which have very different profiles from shellfish.

  The same China study (the real one, not this book) also shows living in a hot climate is highly correlated with low cancer. This exceeds the effect of animal protein by over 700% It also show that homemade cigarettes and alcohol are negatively correlated with cancer, but not at a significant level. But he isn't mentioning that.

  He misrepresents any number of studies that he cites, taking one described by the researcher as "high protein and low fat" and labels it as low protein. He shows an appalling lack of knowledge in the constituents of meats. He suggests Alzheimers can be prevented by a vegan diet, ignoring the vast literature on the preventative aspects of DHA which is only found in animals and marine plankton. His ideology prevents an honest evaluation of the data.

  A pity that the original study is not affordable to the average reader because Campbell is a poor representative of the data and what it means.

• 很不错的书，对科学/自然/求知感兴趣的孩子都可以买一本

  作者：wyc 发布时间：2023-09-25 16:19:14

  很不错的书，字大，纸张也好，翻译的也很棒，整体阅读体验很好。

  书的类型有点像《那些古怪又让人忧心的问题》，但是比那本的可读性强很多，那本书是一种古怪的有趣，大约需要高中理科水平就能读吧，虽然不知道读了有什么用，但是透着一种还是读一读，感觉会有收获的气息的，这本书是非常有趣，不需要大量的前期知识储备，更适合孩子读，当然，大人感兴趣的话读起来也完全没有问题，已加车，待购。