独具魅力的品格 下载 pdf 电子版 epub 免费 txt 2025

——如果你还年轻，你就应该拥有这本书。

本书作者十分重视品格在人生中的巨大价值，他用严肃的态度提醒人们应当从那些伟人的人生经历中吸取有益的东西。

本书所蕴藏的强大生命力是超越时空的。它用前人的智慧提醒当今的人们，在学习各种技术信息的同时，还应当有意识好把自己培养具有高贵品格的人。

如果读完这本书后，你感悟到的东西太多，一时不知从何处下手，建议你采取以下方法：快速翻阅章，找到各章的重点，然后心自问：“哪些品质是我缺少的？”把它们写来放在自己经常能看到的地方，每天激励自己，不许再犯错误，一段时间之后，你会惊奇的发现，这一节给你带来了不小的变化，周围的人渐渐会感受到你的人格魅力，你会感到更加快乐，人们发觉你在“自然而然地”进步，你会感到内心充实。

可以这样说，这是一书能给人们身心健康带来益处的书。

另外，为了增加互动性和趣味性，本书在每一章的结尾收录了几条小测试，祝你阅读愉快！

章 品格是一个人的力量源泉

节 品格的重要性

第二节 品格的分量

第三节 心与心的菜振

第二章 家庭是品格形成的场所

节 家庭是人们的所学校

第二节 母亲的影响力世代相传

第三章 榜样无处不在

节 朋友的影响是潜移默化的

第二节 圣贤之士可以百世为师

第四章 劳动使人获得自由和幸福

节 劳动是幸福之源

第二节 展示自我能力，体现社会价值

第五章 具备无所畏惧的勇气

节 勇气的价值

第二节 勇气的力量

第六章 自律自制是一切美德的基石

节 自律自制的美德的基石

第二节 得体的方行依赖自制

第七章 刻尽职守体现人的品质

节 克尽职守是人类的天职

第二节 克尽职守让人们的心灵得纯真

第八章 温和宽厚的性情具有无穷的力量

节 温和的人坚强

第二节 温和的人性格让你的未来充满希望

第九章 高尚的品格必须经过苦难磨练

节 苦难是品格的炼狱

第二节 直面苦难

塞缪尔·斯迈尔斯（1812——1904），英国十九世纪伟大的道德学家，他写过许多脍炙人口的人生随笔作品。如《自己拯救自己》、《品格的力量》、《人生的职责》、《金钱与人生》等等，在全球畅销一百多年而不衰，改变了亿万人民的命运，他被誉为“西方的成功学之父”、“卡

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：独具魅力的品格在线阅读

在线听书地址：独具魅力的品格在线收听

在线购买地址：独具魅力的品格在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

在当今这个只追求器物的时代，我们绝不能忽略了思想的价值，在给年轻一代传授信息的同时，绝不应该忘记：还应当教育他们成为高贵思想的、诚实而敢说真话的男女；在培养他们的能务的同时，绝不应该忘了；还应当培养他们高贵的人格品性……这是一本能给人们的身心健康带来益处的有价值的书。

作者探讨了品格在人生过程中的巨大价值。他提醒我们应当从那些高尚伟大的人生经历中及取对我们的人生有益的东西，本书内容所蕴藏的强大生命力的超越时空的，它象人生的北斗星一样永远照耀着那些曾经阅读过此书的人。

• 作者：冬眠的knight 发布时间：2013-12-07 16:03:56

  除了那个感言和大刘有半毛钱关系？挂那么大个名字好意思？那啥《斑鸠》近160页的篇幅怎么着也是长篇还插在正中间哗的一下这么厚定价58好意思……最后，看到陈奕璐三个字就头大

• 作者：摸鱼小王子 发布时间：2023-07-13 11:11:45

  a说，b说，c说，我不说。我甚至不想告诉你abc是谁。

• 作者：风之影 发布时间：2023-04-30 22:03:02

  考古学的一个重要职能就是为历史提供实证，补充文献资料的不足。本书是一次“三国志展”里展品的集结，为读者详尽的提供了从汉代兴衰到三分天下这个过程里迄今为止所发现的重要文物，为读者提供了一个近距离接触活生生的历史的机会，很多藏品既具有深刻的历史价值，又具有审美的艺术价值。值得注意的是，由于时代久远很多文物难以流传，迄今所见到的关于汉代三国的文物也多以明器为主。这些当年主要是陪葬品的文物既见证了当年历史的辉煌、衰落与混乱，默默的保存着原始的信息，又在重见天日后召唤着历史的本来面目。本书印刷与用纸都是上佳，文物解说大多言简意赅，大量图片使得本书直观性较强…

• 作者：3W 发布时间：2020-08-03 15:47:49

  1、在对的方向努力收获的是成就，在错的方向努力收获的是教训。

  2、主动进步会觉得享受，被动努力会感到遭罪。

  转机，一本关于职场规划的书。虽然有点冷门，不过作者的建议确实精辟且实用。

• 作者：框框呢 发布时间：2021-12-28 11:35:13

  作案可能性最大的是妻子和陪护，但从两人后续的人生来看，应该是陪护干的。

• 作者：饮鸩止渴 发布时间：2014-05-10 22:52:41

  虽引经据典，但老生常谈，泛泛而论。

• 总书记点过名的瓦氏夫人。

  作者：冲鸭 发布时间：2022-07-28 10:32:36

  1

  第12章说：

  迫近彼枪，乃田州土司瓦氏女将双刀降枪之法，而余移之于枪者也。虽然此时彼实进，则我幸矣！若彼能虚退，何有万全？但两阵相对，必无虚退之枪耳！

  宋案：此抗倭第一女将瓦氏夫人（1496~ 1555年），丈夫去世抚养两代土官，率兵抗倭屡立战功，被封为“二品夫人。这则史料讲到这个女将是用双刀，一般史料都没提到，就好像大家都不谈吴电最后阵亡的时候用的是短兵。

  瓦氏夫人原名岑花，其父岑璋乃归顺直隶州土官(今广西靖西县)。后来嫁给了田州土官、田州知州岑猛，改称“瓦氏”。在今天的广西百色，仍然有田州古城。嘉靖初年，田州与泗城、思恩的岑氏家族争斗，六年（1527年）朝廷出兵八万征讨田州，后岑猛为岳父岑璋毒杀，岑花变成寡妇。长子岑邦彦也战死了。瓦氏夫人以庶母身份，将孙岑芝抚养成人，直到其正式继承土官之位。“凡州之利害，躬为规划，内外凛然”。

  嘉靖二十九年（1550年），朝廷征调兵力平定海南黎族叛乱，岑芝奉命率兵出征，结果战死于海南。于是，瓦氏夫人又担负起了抚育重孙（即岑芝之子）岑大寿、岑大禄的责任，并继续掌管州内政务。

  嘉靖三十三年（1554年），倭寇甚嚣尘上，明廷征讨不济，委派兵部尚书张经征调广西壮族“狼兵”'（俍）等抗倭。瓦氏夫人以大寿、大禄还太过年幼，于是请求自代，此时这个女将已经快60岁了。张授予其“女官参将总兵”衔，率兵员1.3万余人到广西梧州候调。最终朝廷准调4100人、战马450匹，田州幼主岑大寿及其弟岑大禄随征。

  事实上她也就在嘉靖34年干了这两个月。后来张经被严嵩陷害，瓦氏夫人自己回老家也气死了。但就是如此，她深刻的影响了明代的军队，戚继光的鸳鸯阵就是来源于瓦氏兵法。这也是明代武术史上的最重要的一次交流。当时的明代军队以枪为主，而瓦氏夫人偏偏是使双刀的，这也大大启发了当时的兵法家。

  田州岑家兵极富盛名，又以其独特兵法著称，讲究“七人为伍，每伍自相为命，四人专主击刺，三人专主割首，所获首功，七人共分之。”

  1555年三月抵达金山卫，田州兵被划归总兵俞大猷指挥。四月初五，瓦氏奉命到漕泾镇截击倭寇，因敌众我寡而陷入苦战，激战之中，头目钟富、黄维等十四人阵亡，瓦氏怒而亲自披发舞刀，往来突阵中，所乘马尾鬃为倭拔几尽，浴血奋战而出。

  四月十九日，倭两千多人“突出金山卫，从独山往嘉兴。俞大猷先不敢拒，乃率瓦氏兵追其后，被贼反攻，杀伤颇众，大猷先奔，赖瓦氏殿后，得免全复。”

  四月二十一日，倭二千多人南来金山，白泫都司率兵迎击，被倭围困重重，瓦氏奋身往援，纵马冲杀，“女将亲战挥双刀，成团雪片初圆月；麾下健儿二十四，雁翎五十齐翕忽”，岛夷杀尽江海清……”，破寇重围，白乃可得脱。

  四月二十八日，瓦氏夫人又参加了对倭寇的追剿，倭寇被斩首和溺死者达三千人。五月初五，倭寇经金山卫，再度被瓦氏击溃。六月，在陆泾坝战役中，瓦氏夫人率兵斩获倭首三百余级，烧毁海盗船只三十余艘。

  参考文献：

  [1]黄明标. 田州岑氏土司传袭探析[A]. 中共西林县委、西林县人民政府、广西文物考古研究所、广西历史学会.句町国与西林特色文化[C].中共西林县委、西林县人民政府、广西文物考古研究所、广西历史学会:广西历史学会,2008:13.

  [2]白耀天.瓦氏夫人述论[J].广西民族研究,1995(04):31-55.

  [3]韦美兵.试论明代抗倭壮族英雄瓦氏夫人[J].中国民族博览,2019(10):103-105.

  [4]陆照德.广西岑氏土司:一个家族的传奇[J].文史春秋,2018(01):52-58.

  [5]李吉远.明代壮族“狼兵”抗倭武艺考述[J].体育学刊,2012,19(01):114-119.

  [6]谯枢铭 ,黄明标.瓦氏夫人苏松抗倭史迹考[J].史林,1991(02):14-19.

  [7]徐志华.瓦氏夫人与花木兰[J].广西民族研究,1995(03):61-64.

  2

• The Journey from Existential Crisis to Existential Awakening

  作者：小水 发布时间：2015-12-17 16:45:32

  本文通过<Invisible Man>, <Mumbo Jumbo>和威廉布莱克的作品，从存在主义的角度分析爵士和布鲁斯的概念。

  In a deep song voice with a melancholy tone

  I heard that Negro sing, that old piano moan –

  “Ain’t got nobody in all this world,

   Ain’t got nobody but ma self.

            I’s gwine to quit ma frownin’

            And put ma troubles on the shelf.”

                 

   – Langston Hughes, “The Weary Blues”

  Do that thing, jazz band!

  Whip it to a jelly

  Sock it, rock it, heat it, beat it, then fling it at ’em

  Let the jazz stuff fall like hail on king and truck driver, queen and laundress, lord and laborer, banker and bum

                   

      – Frank Marshall Davis “Jazz Band”

  ——————————————————————————

  One cannot understand the blues unless he feels it. But he does, as we all do. Blues is everything discomforting: despair, dread, anxiety, depression… It is part of the human experience living in this world. What is it like to live in this world? I thought about this question while walking in a grocery store, looking at newly arrived Christmas decorations on the shelf and hearing optimistic holiday music playing in the background, finding that this atmosphere is very bizarre. What is Christmas? A socially produced holiday in the name of a religious celebration, which consists of a chain of events that give sense and preserve meaning to keep this tradition running. Where do these Christmas decorations come from? Dirty factories in Southern China where cheap labors work day and night under to produce smiling Santa Claus and evergreen Christmas trees during this season. What do people do during Christmas? Eating, drinking, watching TV, shopping and exchanging gifts. Thinking this gives me the blues. What is the meaning of all this? Where does the meaning come from? Why do we live this way? I know I am not the only one wandering and wondering. One winter night in Harlem generations ago, as the invisible man walks down the street and looks at familiar everyday items in stores, he, too, had a moment of détournement when the familiar is made obscure and absurd:

  A flash of red and gold from a window filled with religious articles caught my eye. And behind the film of frost etching the glass I saw two brashly painted plaster images of Mary and Jesus surrounded by dream books, love powders, God-Is-Love signs, money-drawing oil and plastic dice. A black statue of a nude Nubian slave grinned out at me from beneath a turban of gold. I passed on to a window decorated with switches of wiry false hair, ointments guaranteed to produce the miracle of whitening black skin. ‘You too can be truly beautiful,’ a sign proclaimed. ‘Win greater happiness with whiter complexion. Be outstanding in your social set’ ” (Ellison 262).

  Like Christmas decorations, what he sees are artificially created signs that contain the beliefs and stereotypes of this world that have no inherent meaning or significance. The religious articles reflect human’s selfish hopes and desires that are of nothing transcendental; the false hair and whitening cream show that, for many, “the only sin is in my skin,” because this world’s beauty standard and social system are based merely on looks. There is a sense of absurdity in this description that the world is a man-made playground with arbitrary values and beliefs that are somehow made official, and everyone has to act accordingly. We are so hypnotically used to it that we no longer see the absurdity. “As when one repeats a word until it loses meaning, anxiety undermines the taken-for-granted sense of things. They become absurd” (Crowell). Collectively and blindly, people create order out of chaos, establish institution out of wasteland, build fragment on ruins. So, “what did it mean?” the invisible man quests and questions (262). Existential philosophers Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre had questioned the same, and they found that there is no meaning in the world beyond what meaning is given by human (Crowell). In a world devoid of inherent or higher meaning, one exists without a precise model or a specific purpose (“A selection”). There is no point in life because there is no meaning in the world. People create meaning to give purpose to life. “Existence precedes essence,” Sartre states in his 1946 lecture “Existentialism is a Humanism,” “It means first of all, man exists, turns up, appears on the scene, and, only afterwards, defines himself. If man, as the existentialist conceives him, is indefinable, it is because at first he is nothing. Only afterward will he be something, and he himself will have made what he will be” (“A selection”). In this sense, the man is first a living individual of flesh and bones, and as he grows, he defines his identity and his position in the world through a meaning-making process. As he becomes an identity in the world, he loses his self, which is detached from the world. This is a moment of blues. All of a sudden, the existential bluesman realized that he is nothing for himself, and his life has no purpose other than what he has been lead and taught to believe. The roles he plays in life, the stereotypes he deals with and the order of things are as empty as the Jesus-Is-Love sign. He is thrown into the meaningless world like a boomerang that is moved by the force of contradiction (6), “Ain’t got nobody in all this world, ain’t got nobody but ma self” (Hughes). He made a calling to the world, hoping someone could care and respond, but all he hears is the profound silence from the abyss. He experiences an existential crisis where the very ground of existence is threatened. Albert Murray elaborates this feeling in “The Blues As Such.” “No wonder Hamlet came to debate with himself whether to be or not to be … which is also what the question is when you wake up with the blues there again, as if trying to make you wish that you were dead or had never been born” (6). Blues is existential music. As Raymond Olderman explains in “Ralph Ellison’s Blues and ‘Invisible Man,’ ” Blues “expresses all the ambiguities, contradictions, possibilities, hopes and limitations that lie in the human circumstance” (142).

  Under this circumstance, there is not much one can do. He could play and sing and dance to the blues to cast away the blues, but, like alcohol or drug, it is not a cure but a momentary relief. He could struggle to establish and protect his sense of importance to existence through violence when it is undermined (Peschel 750), as seen in the “changing same” genre of blues such as gangsta rap. Both responses assume that it is the world that lets him down; his meaning of life is given by others, depended on the world, and defined by external factors. In existentialism, the individual’s relation to the external world is termed “being-for-others” by Sartre, which refers to the interpersonal dimension of being that involves a complex play of subjectivity and objectivity (Meakin). One exists not only for himself, but also other people, which means he is subject to other’s gaze, control and influence. Often, this results in one’s self-deception, or “bad faith,” that he understands himself only in terms of his social identities such as his occupation (Meakin). Sartre dreads this idea and claims “Hell is other people” (“No Exit”). However, other existential philosophers proposed an alternative way of thinking: since the world is meaningless and absurd, one can create oneself and live accordingly through making choices and taking responsibility. This means that he gives meaning to himself, for his own reality, as primarily a human being. Soren Kierkegaard calls it “authenticity” (Crowell). In this sense, realizing and accepting the absurdity moves one from an existential crisis to an existential awakening. His ground of existence is no longer threatened, but utterly shattered and rebuilt, so he “wakes up” from the bottom of his dreams – he no longer believes in and depends on the world. There is no one but himself, no rule but his rule, no meaning but his meaning. The world’s absurdity works perfectly for him, because it brings endless possibilities and freedom in which he can move around without limitation or boundary. Malcolm X (1965) puts it as such: “We can not think of being acceptable to others until we have first proven acceptable to ourselves” (Bassay 8). Reinhart works this idea poetically to its most sophisticated form: he is the pimp, the Reverend, the gambler, the lover, the friend (Ellison 489-99). He creates multiple selves and realities, accepts this ability and takes responsibility. Musically, this corresponds with jazz, the sound of freedom and radical beauty that break established boundary and rule where “king and truck driver, queen and laundress, lord and laborer, banker and bum” coexist in music, or, perhaps, they are the same person, a Reinhart. Many order-protectors see jazz as the music of the devil, something religiously non-Christian, practically disrupting order and evoking energy, passion and desire of life. It makes fragment whole, antiphony integral, polyrhythm euphonious. It is alive, arousing, infectious, and brings movement. Jazz liberates people by challenging them to see the world is an illusion and therefore “behold the invisible” for “the unknown wonders” (Ellison 495), so one could improvise his life authentically and play around the structure and stricture – to “sock it, rock it, heat it, beat it, then fling it at ’em” (Davis).

  Blues and Jazz are the two sides of the same coin. They represent both directions to existence: one of a bluesy crisis and the other of a jazzy awakening. Invisible Man provides the foundational text of analysis that illustrates the protagonist’s journey from an existential crisis to his final awakening. To understand this journey, it is important to first see through the illusion and try to “behold the invisible.” In order to do this, we need to know what is the illusion? What kind of forces is at work to maintain this illusion? Why do people believe in it? Ishmael Reed explains this by telling the story of how dominant voice takes control and creates the nationwide big ethos in in Mumbo Jumbo that feeds the illusion. Particularly, this is revealed in the binary of the Wallflower Order, the representation of the dominant power such as government and social order, and Jes Grew, the flip side, such as anti-establishment, Voudoun, jazz and dance. Few scholars had identified Reed’s influence by 19th Century British poet and painter William Blake, who attempts to explain the same questions and binary in his works. I will take The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, America: a Prophecy and The Book of Urizen as primary points of entry to explore his depiction and discussion of the illusory world that produces so much blues and crisis. With this knowledge in mind, we may proceed and examine the existential philosophers’ proposed response to the existential crisis: the existential awakening – “the jazz way.” What is the jazz way? How can one live it? What is it like to live that way? The invisible man presents it through Reinhart and the protagonist’s final hibernation underground, Reed examines it through Jes Grew and its implications, and William Blake explains it by showing how his jazzy character Orc breaks the illusion, embraces and spreads liberation. Although many scholars had pointed out the existential aspect of blues and jazz, none had examined it as a continuous process that carries applicable value in the sense that it provides guidance to real life. Reading blues and jazz as philosophical concepts also takes the entire human race into consideration across race and generation, because what bonds us is what we all have in common: the blues, the struggle, the resistance and the freedom.

  Blues As Existential Crisis

  In the first half of Invisible Man, the protagonist’s invisibility is correlated with his existential crisis in which his ground of existence is shaken by the world. He made this clear in the beginning of the book: “I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me” (3). Refusing to see implies ignoring, which undermines his existence. It prompts him to question if he really exists or is just a phantom (4). He explains this feeling: “You ache with the need to convince yourself that you do exist in the real world, that you’re a part of all the sound and anguish, and you strike out with your fists, you curse and you swear to make them recognize you. And, alas, it’s seldom successful” (4). There is nothing worse than negligence. It is the silence from the abyss that sucks up and takes away the power of calling. It makes one feel dumb, or dead. Like a crying child who merely wants the attention from his parents, the invisible man strikes, curses and swears just to be seen and heard. Philosophically, he is in the state of “being-for-others.” In order to feel his existence, he needs feedback from the external world that proves his existence. He needs something from the abyss that responds to his calling. Unfortunately, the way to get feedback is through “bad faith;” it is to move out of his sense of self and into the role, identity and model assigned by the world. He needs a codependent relationship with the world to be seen and heard by others, and he needs to do it well. He has to fit in, conform, and be a good “pet zombie” or “talking android” or “excellent sheep” so others could “keep this nigger boy running.” This state of being is built upon self-deception, which can be understood as a metaphorical blindness that one chooses to not see who he really is. He is invisible to himself. In Chapter three, the vet in the Golden Day explains this state of being beautifully:

  “You see,” he said turning to Mr. Norton, “he has eyes and ears and a good distended African nose, but he fails to understand the simple facts of life. Understand. Understand? It’s worse than that. He registers with his sense but short-circuits his brain. Nothing has meaning. He takes it in but he doesn't digest it. Already he is – well, bless my soul! Behold! A walking zombie! Already he’s learned to repress not only his emotions but his humanity. He’s invisible, a walking personification of the Negative, the most perfect achievement of your dreams, sir! The mechanical man!”

                                                                                                                                             (94)

  As the vet points out, “nothing has meaning” for the invisible man because he represses his emotions and humanity, refuses to feel for himself, and decides to turn a blind eye on the meaning of being for/as himself. He exists in an absurd world without realizing that it is absurd, so he turns into The Absurd himself, personified as a brain-dead “walking zombie” or a brainless “mechanical man.” How could he seen by others when he does not see himself? How could he see himself when he throw his self away and give it to others? He lies to himself by choosing to believe in the illusory world and its ethos that goes against from his self – it is the “great false wisdom taught [to] slaves and pragmatists alike” (95).

  The vet elaborates on this illusory belief as “white is right” (95). Along this vein, there emerges a contradiction between White and Black, Occidental and Oriental, the world and the individual, others and self. It is the binary, the yin-yang, the force of contradiction and the check and balance of the oppositions that is at work in the existential condition. Contradiction produces gap, in which brews inequality, disappointment, discomfort, and the blues. The invisible man calls this state “boomerang,” a flying object moved by the force of contradiction, which best describes how the world moves (6), and how the individual – a subject in the world – is moved. Take a repeating theme in the book, his grandfather’s final words, as an example: “Live with your head in the lion’s mouth. I want you to overcome ‘em with yeses, undermine ‘em with grins, agree ‘em to death and destruction, let ‘em swoller you till they vomit or bust wide open” (16). This proverbial passage is in and of itself full of contradictions, but it is an ancestral guide to survival in this dangerous world, compared to “the lion’s mouth.” It first recognizes the absurdity and contradictions in the world, and then provides advice to live in a way that reverberates the absurdity. Namely, to hide under a mask that shows contradictory expressions to real motives, which allows one to resist against the fooling of the big illusion by fooling it back. The big illusion is created by one side of the binary, often the dominant one, and is broken by the other side through an awakening that precedes resistance, revolution and liberation.

  Ishmael Reed explains this big illusion in Mumbo Jumbo by looking at its creator, the dominant power in society represented by the Wallflower Order, particularly in its anti-Jes Grew nature. This nature includes appeal to obedience: “You wish all of your subjects were like them, loyal, passive, ‘just doing our jobs,’ ” claimed a hierophant from the Wallflower Order Headquarters (64). This is the ideal state of affairs the Wallflower Order hopes for: having a docile following much like a group of robots. However, if the subjects act out their humanity and decide to disobey as on Jes Grew’s side, harsh control and imperial restraint are used: “Suppose we shut down a few temples … I mean banks, take money out of circulation, how would people be able to support the appendages of Jes Grew … Suppose we put a tax on the dance floors … Suppose we take musicians out of circulation, arrest them on trumped-up drug charges and give them unusually long and severe prison sentences,” claimed another hierophant (154). The Wallflower Order controls the economy, a man-made system of resource allocation that is attached with religious significance as seen in the comparison between bank and temple. It also controls the law, a supposedly fair and just system of rules, which is revealed to be subjective, irresponsible and absurd. Both systems are worldly products that are made highly significant and addictive, and both grant the illusion of order in society. The control of these systems means the control of the people, because, just like drug addicts, the people are dependent on the system. Moreover, the Wallflower Order adopts Christianity, particularly in its monotheist sense that favors absolute control from the head and complete obedience of the people. God’s control is strict because he is understood as a serious poker face. Papa LaBas noticed, “Nowhere is there an account or portrait of Christ laughing. Like the Marxists who secularized his doctrine, he is always stern, serious and as gloomy as a prison guard” (97). The Wallflower Order turns God into an imposter and uses him as a weapon against non-monotheism and disobedience such as Jes Grew (97). It outlaws dance, effaces livelihood, and kills dissent. In other words, God is the force of control and conformity, restraint and repression, the ordered work of western civilization that intrudes non-western minds and bodies, and demands them to change: “They [Africans, or non-Western people in general] must adopt our ways, producing Elizabethan poets; they should have Stravinskys and Mozarts in the wings, they must become Civilized!” claimed Biff Musclewhite, a chief opponent of Jes Grew from a Western art museum (114). In the later part of the book, Reed attributes this contradiction to the Egyptian myth of god Osiris and his opponent Set, who murdered Osiris, the king of Egypt, to usurp power. The Wallflower Order is the modern manifestation of Set: “Everything that Osiris stood for he [Set] attempted to banish, so that he would cut his figure out of his life forever. Next he banished Music. And then as his mind deteriorated he banned Fucking” (173). It is through endless control of the physical and the mental that the big illusion is created and maintained, and it got some problems. It is absurd. It moves with contradiction and conflict. Its meaningless meaning is a big ethos that favors only the authority. The existence of the “Other” – those who are different or subordinate – is threatened, manipulated or eliminated. In this kind of world, how can one not feel the blues? How can a fresh living being swallow the life force for an arbitrary, cold-blooded, mechanical order? How can one discard his own history and tradition in exchange of a civilized god who whips? It is the world that produces blues, which is felt by the suffering individual, and he returns this pain in the form of song. If the world is hell, the angels who live here will sing the blues, or learn to be demons. If the world is an illusion, the waking ones will sing the blues, or deceive themselves to not see.

  Realizing the world is an illusion shakes the foundation of the very reality of things. What is seemingly real is actually an illusion, what is seemingly fair and just is actually dishonest, and what is considered disease is actually life giving. From the contradiction there draws a twist in things: an upside-down derangement, a lie, a sense of hypocrisy, “the darkness of lightness” as the invisible man calls it (6). This contradiction and twist are not new ideas. They were fully explained in William Blake’s mythology, particularly in his creation of Urizen (your reason), representation of reason, intellect, or the Wallflower Order, and his opponent, Orc, representation of energy, passion, or Jes Grew. Originally, Urizen was one of the four living creatures that represent the four aspects of humanity known as The Four Zoas. After his fall, he started to create a fallen world out of reason. This draws a parallel to Satan, the fallen angel from heaven who builds hell on earth (Frye 254-8). In this sense, to the real God, Satan is the fallen angel, but to the fallen world, Satan appears to be god and governor. As the invisible man questions when he acts as Reinhart just by putting on glasses and a hat (masks), “What on earth was hiding behind the face of things? … Who actually was who?” (493). This is the foundation of the twist where Satan and god are flipped in the fallen world. The Christ the Wallflower Order believes in is actually the twisted god who is Satan, and Jes Grew, the pariahs of the world believed to be evil, is actually holy. The success of the twist comes from the mask on the surface made of hypocrisy. According to a reading by John Middleton Murry quoted in June K. Singer’s psychological interpretation of Blake’s works, Urizen’s fallen world is a ratio of the infinite (as Satan to God, fallen world to the original holistic world), which results in limitation and twist. “Urizen’s creation is a mere measuring, dividing, exploring of that which exits: the imposition of the Ratio upon the Infinite” (Singer 199). This does not paint Urizen as an evil demon who intentionally ruin the world, rather, he is simply limited himself because he only sees ratio. His creation is the extension of himself, which is also limited, and he full-heartedly believes in what he sees and does. As Blake depicts, the Ratio is linear, divisive, retraining, much like the “civilized” western scientific way of thinking:

          He formed a line & a plummet

          To divide the Abyss beneath.

          He form’d a dividing rule.

          He formed scales to weigh;

          He formed massy weights;

          He formed a brazen quadrant;

          He formed golden compasses

          And began to explore the Abyss.

          And he planted a garden of fruits.

                                                           (Urizen 20: 33-41)

  Not only is Urizen’s formation a sophisticatedly calculated product, but it is also built on rules and scales that imply law and order. Is Urizen happy in building such a world? Does this world bring happiness? No. Like Papa LaBas’ description of Christ as a gloomy prison guard, Blake describes Urizen as a bluesman full of sorrow:

         Cold he wander’d on high, over

                 their cities

         In weeping & pain & woe!

         And where ever he wander’d, in sorrows

         Upon the aged heavens

         A cold shadow follow’d behind him

         Like a spider’s web. moist, cold & dim

         Drawing out from his sorrowing soul

                                                          (Urizen 25: 5-12)

  He is a “sorrowing soul” who shadows the path behind him, knits a cold and dim web, and brings sorrow to the world through his creations. One of his webs, Blake states, is the “Net of Religion” (Urizen 25: 22) such as Christianity adopted by the Wallflower Order as a means of control. Building the world in sorrow, Urizen is “unseen in tormenting passions … A self-contemplating shadow in enormous labors occupied” (Urizen 3: 19-22). In the fallen world, he produces more and more laws that are covered in an ideal mask, just like the fact that the real Satan is depicted as a fake god under the mask of benevolence and righteousness:

        Laws of peace, of love, of unity:

        Of pity, compassion, forgiveness.

        Let each choose one habitation:

        His ancient infinite mansion:

        One command, one joy, one desire,

        One curse, one weight, one measure,

        One king, one God, one Law.

                                             (Urizen 4: 34-40)

  As the first two lines states, these laws are abstract and good qualities of humanity – “peace, love, unity…” However, they are arranged in space – “ancient infinite mansion” – that externalize and objectify abstractions into materials as in the process of reification, which, ironically, is a logical fallacy . Similarly, abstract qualities are made into law, which means they are no longer qualities, but absurdities. In other words, these qualities appear as feelings driven by the engine of energy, the human pulse, as oppose to law, an Urizenian product of rationality that aims to control and repress. To make feeling into law and assign it to the “infinite mansion” of institution is to systematize and format humanity into scientific order, which results in something twisted and inhumane. For example, the Wallflower Order’s sense of peace is cold, passive and lifeless. They made their “law of peace” according to this standard, which leads to the restriction of the rejuvenating energy and strong feelings in humanity brought by Jes Grew. What they believe in has nothing to do with peace, but law of peace, an anti-peace and anti-human invention. To call such invention “peace, love, unity” is therefore a lie in the sense that the reality does not match with the name. This is hypocrisy. Along this vein, ideal qualities are manipulated and twisted into ugly forms under the command and control of a hypocritical false god, Urizen/Satan/the Wallflower Order, the “one king, one God, one Law” of the fallen world.

  If this big illusion is in fact the fallen world, we can induce that its system of control and dependence, its social modals and roles for the believers, and the meaning of existence in this world are a deliberate web of lies. Take the brotherhood, a microcosmic representation of the fallen world, as an example. In name, it advocates “law of unity” for colored people to be liberated, in reality, all it does is to use a few “talking androids” such as the invisible man to control and direct people into believing their selfish regime. In a debate between the almost awakened invisible man and Brother Jack, Jack confesses, “So now hear this: We do not shape our policies to the mistaken and infantile notions of the man in the street. Our job is not to ask them what they think but to tell them!” (473). In the eyes of the self-proclaimed liberator, the supposedly liberated ones are no more than “mistaken and infantile” sheep and robots who are blind and invisible to the lie of brotherhood. What did the brotherhood tell them? – “To have hope when there was no hope” (507), to have purpose and meaning to existence when there is none. This is how the fallen world functions: outside the lie, one is dispossessed; inside the lie, one is fooled. The purpose of dispossessing and fooling is ultimate control. In whatever forms, the people are lured to sleep, and then live in a dream in obedience and self-deception while repressing emotion and humanity as best as he can – so he doesn’t wake up. Furthermore, not waking up means he is invisible, and his ground of existence can be easily threatened which gives rise to the existential crisis. He is blue. Waking up means he sees the absurdity but cannot do anything. Repressing emotion and humanity, now, is no longer voluntary, but forced – by himself. He is blue. Perhaps, only those who are conscious can sing the blues, because they still have feelings. So, what can one do under this circumstance? The answer is simple: since the world is a fallen one, solution does not come from there. It lies internally. As painful as it is, the existential crisis is actually the first step to an awakening when one steps out of the illusion. Now, he can be a clown but not a fool (Ellison 154), to play the game but not believing in it (153), and to “behold the invisible” (495).

  Jazz as Existential Awakening

          

  The existential awakening is, first and foremost, a response to the crisis. It is one kind of response among other kinds. Kierkegaard (1944) proposed two options of response:

  Two ways, in general, are open for an existing individual: Either he can do his upmost to forget that he is an existing individual, by which he becomes a comic figure, since existence ha a remarkable trait compelling an existing individual to exist whether he will it or not … Or he can concentrate his entire energy upon the fact that he is an existing individual” (Bassey 4-5).

  The first option describes the blues condition, particularly in the aspect where one turns into a blind “mechanical man” or uses whatever form of painkiller to temporarily stomp away and forget the blues of existence. The second option describes the jazz way in which one fully accepts his existential condition in this world and works hard toward survival. Synthesizing the three works I use for this paper, the jazz way of life contains three major aspects: Rinehart – the metamorphous shapeshifter who improvises within structure, Jes Grew – the passionate force that strives for life and humanity, and Orc – the revolutionary voice of disobedience and antiphony that moves others into the same response of awakening. Working together, the jazz way prompts creativity and flexibility out of adversity, and eventually moves one out of the blues without growing bitter. Musically, this theory is proven to be valid in the sense that jazz, the successor of blues, is born out of a lost generation yet drives for freedom and authenticity.

          

  The jazzy character Rinehart is in fact the invisible man under disguise. At this time, he had awakened from his dream (478) and decided to put on a mask to hide from danger and survive. This is a jazzy response. Since the fallen world is governed by hypocrisy, one has to use the enemy’s weapon to fight for himself. What he found after responding in this way is a brand new vision, a vision that sees under the surface with which he becomes the real invisible man. Under this response and this vision, he can code switch – “be both rind and heart” (498), he can play around with a new kind of freedom because “the world in which we lived was without boundaries” (498), and he can find a stable ground in the most unstable state of being – “Rine the rascal was at home” (498). The ability to metamorphosing into different characters under different masks corresponds with the jazz composition of polyphony, a style where two or more independent tones or melodic lines are simultaneously employed (DeVoto). These various tones and melodies can be read as the different characters of Reinhart that exist independently from each other – the different “Rinds.” However, they are at the same time an integral whole, which allows for a coherent sound. This is the “heart” that binds all the parts together, as Rinehart is “a man of parts who got around. Rinehart the rounder” (498). Polyphony seems to suggest a kind of authenticity or Sartre’s “being-for-itself” by performing different identities in the world under different masks and personalities – to create his own meaning of existence. In order to do this, as the invisible man puts, one needs the awareness to see “truth was always a lie” (498), and the self-awareness to know one is acting without believing in the act. Musically, it is to understand the formula of a song and to know when and where to come in and to stop. One cannot break Urizen’s visible creations – the structures, rules and laws of the world, but he can go under the surface and improvise within the structure, move around the rules through shapeshifting, and therefore discover the boundariless possibilities that are hidden. The freedom of movement in jazz is the same. It first recognizes the pattern of a song, and then moves around the beat through syncopation, throws in solos of each independent instrument (character) to improvise for just the right time, and eventually creates a new kind of aesthetic that goes against traditional and strict compositions (social orders).

  The jazz way of life takes one’s entire energy upon his existence and survival. For a gloomy god like Urizen, this is dangerous. It threatens fixed structures, disrupts pre-established orders and brings forth chaos. As a result, in Mumbo Jumbo, the Wallflower Order aims to eliminate such force. However, the premise of the Wallflower Order’s deeds is built on the fundamental twist of the fallen world, and therefore, the position of God and Satan, life and death, plague and anti-plague is reversed. In this fallen world, the voice of the devil – which is actually gods – speaks: “Actually Jes Grew was an anti-plague. Some plagues caused the body to waste away; Jes Grew enlivened the host … some plagues arise from decomposing animals, but Jes Grew is electric as life and is characterized by ebullience and ecstasy. Terrible plagues were due to the wrath of God; but Jes Grew is the delight of the gods” (6). Despite the Wallflower Order’s lie that considers life-giving force a plague, Jes Grew’s electrifying energy and ebullient passion are what really stomp away the blues. It is the full acceptance of existence, the manifestation of human energy, and the power that drives one to keep on living with joy and freedom. Reed comments, “The Wallflower Order launched the war against Haiti … But little Haiti resists. It becomes a world-wide symbol for religious and aesthetic freedom … Dance manias inundate the land” (64). In this sense, the “dance mania” brought by Jes Grew is a form of resistance. Much like a counter reaction that uses poison (mania) to cure the poisoned (apathy caused by repression of emotion and humanity), Jes Grew is the fire that melts the ice-cold fallen world order until something new sprung out of the life-giving water.

  The dynamic of resistance is also strived between Haiti’s religious tradition, Voudoun, and America’s Urizenian religion, Christianity. It is impossible to separate music with the religious power behind it. Tracing Jes Grew back to its root of Osiris, the Egyptian god is “associated with fertilization and spring. In his time, ‘every man was an artist and every artist a priest’ ” (164). Music is the audio manifestation of the spirits brought to the human realm by the artist-priest. In this sense, jazz, the music of Jes Grew, is the sound of Voudoun and the loas. Reed state, “You see the Americans do not know the names of the long and tedious list of deities and rites as we know them … they’ve isolated the unknown factor which gives the loas their rise. Ragtime. Jazz. Blues. The new thang” (152). After coming to America, the loas, along with their music, have to accept their new home and adapt to the new context. Ragtime, jazz and blues are the fusion and diffusion of African traditional music with the music of this new context, which are mostly European-inspired (Baraka 64). This synthesis allows tradition to survive – “the location may shift but the function remains the same” (77). As a result, African music in the foster land is “an experimental art form” (152) that preserves religious tradition and function on one hand, and innovates to cater to the new crowd on the other. Therefore, the existence of “the new thang” represents a place for the loas in a new world, and the life-giving “dance mania” represents the resistance against losing tradition, the ardent fight for this new place, and the infectious cry that calls for a continuous, meaningful life. Musically, the experimental nature of jazz is rooted in the existential experiment of synthesis and adaptation. The polytheist nature of Voudoun corresponds with jazz’s polyphony and polyrhythm. As if each loa takes a timber and a beat, a family of loas coexists behind music. “Erzulie with her fast self is sheltered in a ‘vocalising’ trumpet which sings from mute to crowl. Legba takes requests from behind the derby-covered bell of a ‘talking’ slide-trombone” (77). Just like Reinhart the rounder who synthesizes multiple personas into a holistic character and makes it work in the “vast seething, hot world of fluidity” like fish in water, each loa hides in an instrument as an invisible man, but at the same time communicates and preaches through music on its own terms. The more they preach, the more people “feed” them: “you feed your Ragtime and Jazz by supporting the artists and making it easier for those who are possessed by those forms. Buying records and patronizing those places which are not in the hands of Atonists” (151). The result of this is a worldwide plague of newly discovered joy and freedom for not only Africans, but also all the people who were bounded in Urizenian control for thousands of years.

  The life-giving force of Jes Grew draws a parallel with William Blake’s creation, Orc. In Blake’s works, the timeless theme of resistance was depicted between Orc and Urizen. As two aspects of humanity, these two characters are in constant battle, which marks the basic condition of human existence. Blake states in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, “Without Contraries is no progression. Attraction and repulsion, reason and energy, love and hate, are necessary to human existence” (3: 6-9). Like the movement of boomerang, it is the force of contradiction that progresses the world, the constant check-and-balance of opposites that drives the motion. Without the opposing force of energy, the world will be in a dead homeostasis under the sole governance of reason. In fact, Blake had a prophetic vision about the practical use of energy, which is highly relevant to Jes Grew’s resistance and the final liberation of the oppressed. In “A Song of Liberty,” Blake foresees:

  Look up! Look up! O citizen of London, enlarge thy countenance! O Jew, leave counting gold! Return to thy oil and wine. O African! Black African! (go, winged thought, widen his forehead.) …

  Spurning the clouds written with curses, stamps the stony law to dust, loosing the eternal horses from the dens of night, crying: Empire is no more! And now the lion & wolf shall cease.

                                                                                                            (Marriage 25-27: 12-21)

  Written in an imperative tone, Blake advocates Africans to unleash the energy and let the winged thoughts fly out. By doing so, they can finally spurn the curses of Urizen and stamp his stony law and order to dust. The “eternal horses” can be read as the bounded feet that want to run away and run wild, to dance and to gallop toward freedom and light. Until the moment it loosens the chain from “the dens of night,” the oppressor – Empire, lion & wolf – will no longer oppress. In America: A Prophecy, Blake further explains how the revolutionary spirit liberates the oppressed in exuberant energy:

          

          Reviving shake, inspiring move, breathing, awakening,

          Spring like redeemed captives when their bonds and bars are burst!

          Let the slave grinding at the mill run out into the field;

          Let him look up into the heavens and laugh in the bright air;

          Let the enchained soul shut up in darkness and in sighing,

          Whose face has never seen a smile in thirty weary years,

          Rise and look out: his chains are loose, his dungeon doors are open.

                                                                                                             (America 8: 4-10)

  The existential awakening is apparent: after “thirty [and more] weary years” of blues, the oppressed will no longer be locked in chains and put in dungeon. He finally revives, breaking loose the bonds and bars of physical and mental slavery – and laughs, truly. Written for a central theme of liberation, this passage, too, approaches this theme in an imperative tone that provokes the mood of revolution and moves the audience to a response. This corresponds with the jazz style of antiphony, the call and response that inspires for an answer. This response is not only in music, but also in the style of one’s very existence that reciprocates the revolutionary spirit’s calling. Camus’ abyss is no longer silent, but echoes back with an even louder volume. This is “the epidemic contagiousness of jazz that makes it, like measles, sweep the block” where “young men wearing slave bracelets, sitting in the cafes quoting nigger poetry. The young women smoking Luckies, wearing short skirts and staying out until 3:00 in the morning” (Reed 64-66). These young men and women are engaging in the act of antiphony by responding to and participating in the Jes Grew revolution of human energy. The chain of Urizen cannot bound their authenticity; the modals, roles and stereotypes of the society cannot limit their being-for-themselves. Existence is ecstasy when one sees through the illusion and starts creating his own meaning, own world.

  In conclusion, blues is the musical form of an existential crisis where one cannot find the meaning of life outside of external references. It is also the condition of the fallen world mapped by Urizenian law and order under a hypocritical mask. The repressed emotion and humanity under strict ruling turns into pain and suffering, vocalized as the blues that temporarily alleviates the symptoms of the crisis. However, when one separates himself from this world and sees it with a penetrating vision, the illusion collapses, and the ocean of possibility underneath the illusion presents itself as an identity laboratory for the real invisible man. Living in the jazz way allows one’s experimentation and improvisation with identities through putting on different masks. It also gives rise to the human engine of energy that promotes life and freedom, breaks the order that builds the blues, and moves others to respond and participate. Synthesizing the works of African American writers and a British poet points to the universality of blues and jazz themes and theories. Existence as a human condition and liberation as a collective response are states of being above the arbitrary category of race – we all belong to the human race. More discussions can be made on the implication of the invisible man’s moving underground as another existential response, along with analysis of more contemporary issues on the subject.

  Bibliography

  Anderson, Maureen. "The White Reception of Jazz in America."

  African American Review 38.1 (2004): 135-45.

  Baraka, Amiri. "Primitive Blues and Primitive Jazz."

  Blues People Negro Music in White America. New York: Perennial, 2002

  Bassey, M. O. "What Is Africana Critical Theory or Black Existential Philosophy?"

  Journal of Black Studies 37.6 (2007): 914-35.

  Birt, Robert. "Existence, Identity, and Liberation."

  Existence in Black: An Anthology of Black Existential Philosophy by Lewis R. Gordon.

  New York: Routledge, 1997. 203-15.

  Blake, William, and David Fuller. William Blake: Selected Poetry and Prose.

  Harlow, England: Longman, 2000.

  Camus, Albert, and Justin O'Brien. The Myth of Sisyphus. London: Penguin, 2000

  Crowell, Steven. "Existentialism."

  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 23 Aug. 2004. Web.

  Ellison, Ralph. Invisible Man. New York: Vintage International, 1995.

  Frank Marshall Davis. “Jazz Band.” 1935.

  Gourlay, Alexander S. "An Emergency Online Glossary of Terms, Names, and Concepts in Blake." Blake Archive. Morris Eaves, Robert N. Essick, and Joseph Viscomi, n.d. Web.

  Hughes, Langston. “The Weary Blues.” 1926.

  Hume, Kathryn. "Ishmael Reed and the Problematics of Control."

  Pmla 108.3 (1993): 506-18.

  Meankin, Paul. "'Hell Is Other People': Sartre and Being-for-others." & "’I Am Condemned to Be Free': Sartre, Freedom and Bad Faith."

  Pathways to Philosophy - ISFP Associate Award - Paul Meakin: Essay Three.

  Murray, Albert. “The Blues as Such” & "The Blues Face to Face." Stomping The Blues.

  New York: Random House, 1976. 1-20

  Olderman, Raymond M. "Ralph Ellison's Blues and ‘Invisible Man.’"

  Wisconsin Studies in Contemporary Literature 7.2 (1966): 142-59.

  Peschel, Enid Rhodes. "Themes of Rebellion in William Blake and Arthur Rimbaud."

     The French Review 46.4 (1973): 750-61.

  Punter, David. "Blake and Hegel: Comparisons and Distinctions." Blake, Hegel, and Dialectic.

    Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1982. 72-122.

  Reed, Ishmael. Mumbo Jumbo. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1972.

  Sartre, Jean Paul. "A Selection from Existentialism and Human Emotions.”

  Existentialism and Human Emotions. Trans. Bernard Frechtman.

  David Banach Saint Anselm's College, n.d. Web.

  Sartre, Jean-Paul, and S. Gilbert. No Exit. New York: Knopf, 1976.

  Schmitz, Neil. "Neo-HooDoo: The Experimental Fiction of Ishmael Reed."

  Twentieth Century Literature 20.2 (1974): 126-40.

  Singer, June K., and William Blake. The Unholy Bible.

  G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, 1970.

  Weate, Jeremy. "Changing the Joke: Invisibility in Merleau-Ponty and Ellison."

   Philosophia Africana 6.1 (2003): 5-21.